The main difference between CapCut and Shotcut is the use of the GPU (65% vs 12%-15%). | | Av Bit-rate | Av Bit-rate | Av Bit-rate | Qual=55% | Qual=55% | | | | Hardware | Software | Hardware | Software | Exported it in several formats with Shotcut (Av-Bitrate: 12.8Mb and Quality based VBR 55%)) Hardware-encoding, Software-encoding, parallel processing always enabled.Exported it in CapCut (Av Bit-rate: 12.8Mb).I did the experiment Brian suggested on my 6-Processor AMD Rizen 5 4500U system with integrated Radeon graphics. Shotcut is developed (mainly) by Dan and Brian with an annual revenue of $0.

In both cases the same file size + encoding time.ĬapCut is developed by ByteDance, a company with 130,000 employees and a revenue of $60Billion per annum. In Shotcut (win64-221221 portable) it makes no difference whether I switch on hardware or software encoding. How can this serious difference in encoding time occur? Shotcut = creates 125 MB file in 14 minutes ( 840 seconds).ĬapCut = creates 129 MB file in 45 seconds.Īll exported films look the same in terms of quality. Time of export directly one after the other (Shorcut, CapCut, VSDC then for comparison CapCut, VSDC, Shotcut).Settings for the export (codecs 5 mbit Hardwareenc).Filters (4 x text, all clips enlargement 110% no rotation, 1 clip slow motion).I have created 1 identical project each with Shotcut, CapCut, VSDC Pro. I know that there have already been many discussions about exports, but I cannot explain the following difference:

How to resize a video on capcut